Sunday, July 5, 2009

An overview of BPM - Balanced Productivity Metrics

Balance productiveness metrics are beneficial in increasing the output of an organization through a sophisticated and proven approach. These programs should be devised by experts or an individual having interest in the field if you desire a profitable output.

Productivity metrics is the best way to keep a check on your employees. It provides you with a measure of the productivity.

Balanced Productiveness Metrics or BPM includes the usage of both qualitative and quantitative data that is used to measure improvement
n productivity and performance. The primary objectives in the formation of balanced productiveness metrics is improving the productivity, quality and then finally reducing the risk through consistent procedures. These productiveness metrics primarily focuses on the core measures of SEI CMM (Software Engineering Institute Capability Maturity Model) programs. Apart from that it also concentrates on the data accumulated for measuring the improvement in the processes.

Multi-dimensional approaches are necessary for measuring the improvement in productivity in a method, which also offers an appreciation of the factors that concerns environment and others that influences the productivity of the project.

Advantages of BPM. The Balanced Productiveness Metrics methods are utilized for measuring the efficiency with relation to the maintenance and development of the software. Balanced Productiveness Metrics are devised on the basis of certain management principles. These management principles used in improvement of productivity should be focused on accomplishing a suitable balance of cost (effort), quality (rate of defect) and time (schedule) improvement.

Such productiveness metrics are consistent with the philosophy of balanced scorecards. Since, such components of productiveness metrics can never be independently observed with relation to offering an assessment of valid productivity.

Is productiveness metrics similar to balloon filling. Balancing TCQ seems similar to balloon filling. The balloon burst when they are compressed or filled beyond the acceptable limit. If it does not burst and the compression is more in an area, the expansion takes place in the other part. Similarly, if the time (schedule) of a project is compressed beyond the acceptable limit than the outcome can be either failure or the cost (effort) related to the project, quality (defects) related to the project and production are increased in a disproportional manner that results an increase in the maintenance cost (effort).

If you take the reverse side of the coin then also you will get the formulated results. Schedules of the project can also be given a boost that can result in the reduction of the defects and the efforts. However, it might not provide the business value that you have desired at the time of the formulation of the plan. Henceforth, you require a more balanced measurement method for attaining the desired result.

Critical factors in attaining success from balance productiveness metrics

There are numerous factors that have been proved critical in the triumphs of the Balanced Productiveness Metrics:

- You should have an open path of communication between the client and your organization

- You should provide a support for senior management along with a documented statement of your policies

- A manage for client programs, metrics management of client performances, management of IT project and support to IT metrics groups should be provided along with other synchronized procedures

- You should have an accurate collection of data and size them on timely basis

- You can utilize qualitative and quantitative project-level metrics data to plan software projects and improve the processes involved

- You should also monitor the development in training, mentoring and communication aspects that has sound relation with BPM processes


About the Author If you are interested in productiveness metrics, check this web-site to learn more about productivity metrics.